| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:13:06 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> tove was trying to use it for perl: |
| 5 |
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/perl-overlay.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=1a4be047e0ad2f13a7eeab9a5295557023ef2d62 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well, I still think it's horrible (and I think the same about pretty |
| 8 |
> much anything else using has_version...), but I can't come up with any |
| 9 |
> creative way of interpreting PMS to say that it *should* be illegal... |
| 10 |
> So if we're making a change, it's a retroactive one to work around a |
| 11 |
> Portage bug... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> *shrug* I have no strong opinion on how we handle it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
At least has_version is an improvement over built_with_use. |
| 17 |
Going with it being a Portage bug is fine by me. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Petteri |
Archives