Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Brian Harring <ferringb@...>
Subject: Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:30:44 -0700
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:43:55AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 03:53 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > +^[ \t]*EAPI=(['"]?)([A-Za-z0-9+_.-]*)\1[ \t]*(#.*)?$
> 
> We could make the ([A-Za-z0-9+_.-]*) group "optional", but treat it as 
> an error if the group is missing. That way, the package manager can 
> detect invalid assignments earlier, and can skip sourcing the ebuild in 
> this case.

Or disallow EAPI= .

There isn't any reason to reset it to an unknown EAPI manually like 
that; if code does that, the code is wrong imo, thus skip trying to 
parse that.
~harring


Replies:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Zac Medico
References:
EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by thread:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Previous by date:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by date:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.