Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Jacob Godserv <jacobgodserv@...>
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: EAPI 4
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:12:38 +0100
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Jacob Godserv wrote:

>> Just a PMS idler, but my uneducated opinion (in case you wanted one ;)
>> would be to keep EAPI 5 in master and branch for EAPI 4.

> I should explain that a bit. Master would be the branch that contains
> everything, and the eapi4 branch would be the to contain just the
> EAPI4 set of features.

So far the policy was that master should be kept as tidy as possible.
For example, preparation for EAPI 3 (now called 4) was done in a
branch.

And we don't know yet what will be in EAPI 5. It's likely that the two
features just removed from EAPI 4 will be part of it, but we cannot be
sure (we thought they would be in EAPI 3 ...). Therefore I'd prefer
not to keep them in master.

Ulrich


References:
EAPI 4
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI 4
-- Jacob Godserv
Re: EAPI 4
-- Jacob Godserv
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: EAPI 4
Next by thread:
Re: EAPI 4
Previous by date:
Re: EAPI 4
Next by date:
Patch for review: Fix scope of ED variable


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.