Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-pms@g.o
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:11:25 +0200
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

>> And if possible, it should be specified in a way that doesn't
>> invalidate ebuilds with harmless permutations like this:
>> 
>> WANT_AUTOCONF="2.1"
>> EAPI="3"

> That would make it an utter pain in the ass to specify and verify...
> How much does this right now?

If my script is working correctly, 130 ebuilds in the Portage tree
(which is less than I had expected). I haven't checked any overlays.

Ulrich


References:
EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by thread:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Previous by date:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by date:
Re: EAPI specification in ebuilds


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.