Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> A thing I would like to talk about it. Why is the line wrap the way
> it is? Emacs always complains and he has the authority regarding line
> wrap.
Lines with a width of 100 characters are hard to read, therefore I
would much prefer a more conventional value like 70 or 72. Maybe with
exceptions for some of the tables.
A good time for making such a change would be when EAPI 3 is finished.
What do you think?
Ulrich
|
|
