Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-pms
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
Subject: Re: PROPERTIES contradiction?
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:52:13 +0100
Hi,

Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>:
> In file eapi-differences.tex, section "EAPI 4", PMS says:
> ,----
> | EAPI 4 is EAPI 3 with the following changes:
> |  * PROPERTIES support is mandatory.
> `----
> 
> Whereas in file dependencies.tex, subsection "Properties", it seems to
> contradict the above:
> ,----
> | The following tokens are permitted inside PROPERTIES:
> |  * interactive
> |    The package may require interaction with the user via the tty.
> |
> | Ebuilds may not rely upon any token being supported.
> `----
> 
> Should the last sentence be deleted?

 I would say so.

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
PROPERTIES contradiction?
-- Ulrich Mueller
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-pms: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
PROPERTIES contradiction?
Next by thread:
Re: PROPERTIES contradiction?
Previous by date:
PROPERTIES contradiction?
Next by date:
Re: PROPERTIES contradiction?


Updated Jul 18, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-pms mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.