Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] feature freeze for 2.1
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 17:15:57
Message-Id: 4458E4D1.3000106@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] feature freeze for 2.1 by Simon Stelling
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Simon Stelling wrote:
5 > Zac Medico wrote:
6 >> the addition of new features. From this time forward, please do not
7 >> commit anything to the 2.1 branch (current trunk) unless it is a fix
8 >> for functionality that already exists. Thank you in advance for
9 >> your cooperation.
10 >
11 > Why don't we make 2.1 a real branch and use trunk for 2.2?
12 >
13
14 If there's a need to have immediate activity in the 2.2 branch then
15 we certainly should. If not, it's just extra work to merge stuff
16 between
17 the two.
18
19 Zac
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iD8DBQFEWOTQ/ejvha5XGaMRAlYoAJ0S1gQkUDBuHOfxZlYP1t5aWy/kAACbBeYO
24 3trOZs5yTGe2ftzTbRr0cZw=
25 =Yof5
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 --
28 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list