Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Elfyn McBratney <beu@×××.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Running commands after a merge (via /etc/portage/package.hooks)
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:31:20
Message-Id: 200409241053.13748.beu@gnu.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Running commands after a merge (via /etc/portage/package.hooks) by Marius Mauch
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 hello Marius,
5
6 On Friday 24 Sep 2004 09:28, Marius Mauch wrote:
7 > On 09/24/04 Michael Kohl wrote:
8 > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:50:38 +0900
9 > >
10 > > Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> wrote:
11 > > > The test function wouldn't work for two reasons. One is that the
12 > > > test function is run before the package is merged to the live
13 > > > filesystem. Actually, it's run before src_install is even ran. The
14 > > > second reason is that it is not run at all for binary packages.
15 > >
16 > > Would it be possible to add something to pkg_postinst which would
17 > > parse this proposed new file in /etc/portage?
18 >
19 > Ehm, this file hasn't even been discussed really, so there isn't really
20 > a point to ask about implementation details. Also, why would you want to
21 > parse it from an ebuild?
22
23 ;-)
24
25 I'll upload a patch (against latest portage CVS) to
26 <http://elfyn.demon.co.uk/> soon (the name will be obvious 8-)
27
28 Elfyn
29
30 - --
31 Elfyn McBratney
32 beu on irc.freenode.net/savannah.[non]gnu.org
33
34 PGP Key ID: 0x456548B4
35 PGP Key Fingerprint:
36 29D5 91BB 8748 7CC9 650F 31FE 6888 0C2A 4565 48B4
37 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
38 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
39
40 iD8DBQFBU+6IaIgMKkVlSLQRAuoQAKC5HGnjmInTvEDeVrEHqsDohCw4jACfZ+5a
41 x9/L7TzIGTBlOxL8x+5tISo=
42 =VqmD
43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
44
45 --
46 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list