1 |
tvali wrote: |
2 |
> I think that it would make things more clear and simple if portage did |
3 |
> support the following (maybe some are already included, but not found by |
4 |
> me): |
5 |
> |
6 |
> * Add package to "world" checking all dependencies, but not emerging |
7 |
|
8 |
Not sure what exactly that is supposed to mean, but I guess it's already |
9 |
doable with --noreplace and --onlydeps. |
10 |
|
11 |
> * Remove package from "world" without unmerging |
12 |
|
13 |
$EDITOR /var/lib/portage/world |
14 |
or |
15 |
sed -i -e '/<category>\/<package>/d' /var/lib/portage/world |
16 |
|
17 |
Maybe worth integrating when generic set support is available. |
18 |
|
19 |
> * Save all important messages into file instead of beeping (i may be |
20 |
> away from home); optionally replay them at end of update |
21 |
|
22 |
see http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-131795.html |
23 |
|
24 |
> * When updating or installing new package, if something goes wrong, |
25 |
> still emerge other packages, which havent failed packages as |
26 |
> dependencies -- in my case, for example, when i do --update, for |
27 |
> example, then the fact that update of first package fails does not |
28 |
> definitely mean that i dont want to update others |
29 |
|
30 |
This has been rejected in the past as it isn't always a good idea as you |
31 |
might want to change your plans if a package fails. Maybe as an optional |
32 |
feature, but even then it's rather low priority. |
33 |
|
34 |
Marius |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |