Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:56:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4ADAD84E.7070006@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? by Amit Dor-Shifer |
||
| 1 | Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: |
| 2 | > Thanks. |
| 3 | > IMHO this usage of env.d should be documented in the ebuild howto, as it |
| 4 | > presents a useful-yet-not-trivial mechanism. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I'd document it, if: |
| 7 | > a) I get no objection from others. Anyone? |
| 8 | > b) I'd be referred to the proper place to document it in. There's a page |
| 9 | > dealing w/ |CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK at |
| 10 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/config-protect/index.html, |
| 11 | > but I doubt if that's the proper place. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | It's touched upon in the User Handbook here: |
| 14 | |
| 15 | http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#book_part2_chap5 |
| 16 | |
| 17 | It might be nice to mention it somewhere in the Developer Handbook: |
| 18 | |
| 19 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?full=1 |
| 20 | |
| 21 | That's maintained by the devrel team, and you can file a bug for |
| 22 | them at bugs.gentoo.org. |
| 23 | -- |
| 24 | Thanks, |
| 25 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? | Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@××××××.com> |