Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:29:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4AD79437.9030109@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? by Amit Dor-Shifer |
||
| 1 | Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: |
| 2 | > I.E.: can an ebuild instruct that one of its deployables under /etc |
| 3 | > shall be "mercilessly auto-update"d? |
| 4 | > Using /etc/make.conf/CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK for a single file seems a bit |
| 5 | > unnatural to me: a general-purpose file specifying a file o/w unknown |
| 6 | > and unrelated to it. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | There are lots of ebuilds that install files in /etc/env.d/ |
| 9 | containing CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK settings. It think that's what you want. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Thanks, |
| 13 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Can an ebuild override CONFIG_PROTECT? | Amit Dor-Shifer <amitds@××××××.com> |