| 1 |
On Saturday 15 April 2006 10:51, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported |
| 3 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607 |
| 4 |
> Is this a 'NOTABUG' case? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
personally i'd say "not worth the hassle, fix the brain dead URL" |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Bug: gpg: "strict" incorrectly takes priority over "severe" |
| 9 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68906 |
| 10 |
> What's the expected behaviour? Is it NOTABUG? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
by the description, sounds like it should be changed as suggested |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Bug: Method to monitor a package without installing/upgrading it |
| 15 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47456 |
| 16 |
> Same thing. Do we want this? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
i'd say kill it |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Bug: Support for a pre-compile pkg_config |
| 21 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99529 |
| 22 |
> As Jason mentioned: Is this worth the effort? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
with some packages, USE flags are the wrong solution (think php times 10) ,,, |
| 25 |
but i dont think integration into portage really works ... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> Bug: Wording "These are the packages that I would merge, in order:" |
| 28 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112439 |
| 29 |
> This needs a decision too. What wording do we prefer? Either way, the bug |
| 30 |
> should be closed, the fix is trivial in case we want to change it. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
WONTFIX imo |
| 33 |
-mike |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives