Archives
Archives
| From: | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng roadmap? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:08:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040628160820.17a07020@sven.genone.homeip.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng roadmap? by Adrian Gschwend |
||
| 1 | On 06/28/04 Adrian Gschwend wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Unfortunately I couldn't find much about it, so I decided to ask here |
| 4 | > about the status. How is portage-ng getting along? Is there a roadmap |
| 5 | > somewhere? What needs to be done? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | It's not getting along at all, we're concentrating our efforts on the |
| 8 | current portage. Right now I consider portage-ng a dead project. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Marius |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 14 | |
| 15 | In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 16 | Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng roadmap? | Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××××××.com> |
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: portage-ng roadmap? | Adrian Gschwend <ktk@×××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-ng roadmap? | Pieter Van den Abeele <pvdabeel@g.o> |