Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From:	Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To:	gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Vote to revert all changes related to shallow git fetch from bug 552814
Date:	Mon, 07 Nov 2016 22:22:55
Message-Id:	`406e641c-8b02-bb06-fa4e-5ef4f557b2a4@gentoo.org`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Vote to revert all changes related to shallow git fetch from bug 552814 by Brian Dolbec

1	On 11/07/2016 12:28 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2	> On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 11:26:06 -0800
3	> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
4	>
5	>> Given the performance issues introduced by `git update-index` and `git
6	>> prune`, shallow fetch doesn't seem to be a practical default at this
7	>> time.
8	>>
9	>> In order to prepare a release that will be eligible for
10	>> stabilization, I propose that we revert all of the changes related to
11	>> bug 552814:
12	>>
13	>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=84413bb1dd9df322568ce25efc5b7854a43d03c7
14	>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=55aef9bf297ef8cbf29921acb454449d01313818
15	>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=f5d258656de3db54af06fbca9b8da5217d3802f4
16	>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=f77fcd6b0b4ebb49ca62f5767cd5c931127c3dbb
17	>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=d075422a8902617833ec945d94beb0bb334d44c9
18	>>
19	>
20	> Yeah, this will be best, go for it.
21	>
22
23	Reverted:
24
25	https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=ab840ac982d3c8b676b89f6bedd14e85dd06870f
26	--
27	Thanks,
28	Zac