Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Moving ebuild-related where they belong
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 17:42:48
Message-Id: 45005829.7050203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Moving ebuild-related where they belong by Simon Stelling
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Simon Stelling wrote:
5 > Brian Harring wrote:
6 >> B) fragmentation this implicitly enables
7 >> isn't good.
8 >
9 > I agree here.
10 >
11
12 Fragmentation is always a potential with free and open software. People can
13 fork if they want or collaborate if they want. The choice is theirs.
14
15 Zac
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iD8DBQFFAFgo/ejvha5XGaMRApacAKDKrMaNpx3sxtXA+Tk89W2pswEhUwCgwAdc
20 vIDB7wnr8CYjzbtPJkYSLxc=
21 =udnD
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 --
24 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list