Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Disarm FEATURES=distcc-pump
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 20:45:03
Message-Id: 1531773894.1439.11.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Disarm FEATURES=distcc-pump by Zac Medico
1 W dniu pon, 16.07.2018 o godzinie 13∶16 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico
2 napisał:
3 > On 07/16/2018 02:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > The pump mode of distcc has been causing issues for years now,
5 > > and upstream does even attempt to fix it. Disarm the FEATURES so that
6 > > people do not have to do that themselves after discovering all the bugs.
7 > > ---
8 > > bin/phase-functions.sh | 17 -----------------
9 > > man/make.conf.5 | 5 ++++-
10 > > pym/_emerge/EbuildPhase.py | 2 +-
11 > > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
12 >
13 > Maybe we should simply support RESTRICT="distcc-pump" so that
14 > incompatible ebuilds can disable it? I don't see that many bug reports
15 > about it, and a forums search turned up this recent thread which
16 > suggests that some people may be using it:
17
18 I did. There are only two reasons you don't see them often:
19
20 1. because not that many people use distcc,
21
22 2. because when they do, they quickly learn how broken it is and disable
23 it.
24
25 RESTRICT won't be helpful because distcc-pump is also capable of silent
26 miscompilations and indirect breakage. If you used it at least once, my
27 only advice is to rebuild your entire system.
28
29 >
30 > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1082176-highlight-distccpump.html
31
32 --
33 Best regards,
34 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Disarm FEATURES=distcc-pump konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com>