| 1 |
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:13:34 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So, I'd like to create 2.1 branch that is closed to mostly anything |
| 5 |
> except regression fixes and release it as portage-2.1_rc1 this |
| 6 |
> Saturday. We can continue to do ~arch releases of the development |
| 7 |
> branch (2.2 or whatever it becomes) every 2 weeks. Does now seem |
| 8 |
> like a good time for this transition? Your feedback would be |
| 9 |
> appreciated. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'd like to hold off with the rc status until the manifest2 code got |
| 12 |
some public testing first in another pre release. I don't feel |
| 13 |
comfortable labeling 2.1 as "basically release ready" when only a dozen |
| 14 |
people have tested something that critical. |
| 15 |
The remaining feature I'd like to get into 2.1 is the tree-format-check |
| 16 |
issue, but that could probably be slipped in in the rc phase (don't |
| 17 |
really like that idea, but it's an option). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Marius |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives