| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Alec Warner wrote: |
| 5 |
> Vapier in particular has backported some changes into the 2.0.54 tree |
| 6 |
> with I assume hopes to make a 2.0.55 release. The 2.1 release is a |
| 7 |
> large change over the 2.0 series, I'd like to give people a bit more |
| 8 |
> time on 2.0. For a while this may mean 2.0 and 2.1 stable at the same |
| 9 |
> time, although there is no harm in that either. We haven't had a new |
| 10 |
> 2.0 release in a while, and there are features worth backporting IMHO. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Remember that while most of the development community runs portage-2.1 |
| 13 |
> many of the users do not; and they have not seen a 2.0 release in some |
| 14 |
> time. I think we can stable 2.0.55 faster than 2.1, as 2.1 will |
| 15 |
> probably need a series of _rc releases before being considered stable. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Maybe 2.0.55 can be stabled slightly faster. But is it really worth anyones time, even to keyword it? Not it my mind. As the gap widens between 2.0.54 and 2.1, the value of a 2.0.55 release diminishes accordingly. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Zac |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFENgwq/ejvha5XGaMRApvTAKDDr2QLizhvrgouTcf8UBidfnhsvQCgvWKC |
| 24 |
XFW64BXfCDTw2aPe2usj2eE= |
| 25 |
=N5au |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives