Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Support unprivileged mode for bug #433453.
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:54:35
Message-Id: 20141022155348.53fecd65.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] Support unprivileged mode for bug #433453. by Zac Medico
1 On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:51:06 -0700
2 Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 09/29/2014 11:23 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
5 > > From 313604d52e6764ba360cd938fa6bf480895e793c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
6 > > 2001 From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
7 > > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:18:42 -0700
8 > > Subject: [PATCH] Support unprivileged mode for bug #433453.
9 > >
10 > > This takes the existing unprivileged prefix support and enables it
11 > > to work when EPREFIX is empty. This "unprivileged" mode is
12 > > automatically enabled if the current user is not root, but has
13 > > write access to the EROOT directory (not due to the 0002 bit). For
14 > > use in conditional logic (for example, see doebuild.py diff),
15 > > "unprivileged" is automatically added to the FEATURES variable.
16 > >
17 > > X-Gentoo-Bug: 433453
18 > > X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433453
19 >
20 > Now that 2.2.14 in released, can we merge this?
21
22 yes
23
24 --
25 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>