1 |
On Thursday 23 March 2006 23:43, Brian wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2006-23-03 at 22:14 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 16:23, Brian wrote: |
4 |
> > > /etc/portage/lists/userlist1 |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > format: |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > net-www/apache |
9 |
> > > www-apache/mod_perl |
10 |
> > > ... |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > If you make that "/etc/portage/sets" and support any package atom (rather |
13 |
> > than only cat/pkg) then I you'd pretty much have what is planned (afaik). |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > -- |
16 |
> > Jason Stubbs |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> What about adding the other update config similar to package.keywords |
20 |
> |
21 |
> quoting me: |
22 |
> Where updates could be one or more of "M" manual, "A" automatic, "N" |
23 |
> never, "K" binary packages only. Also "L" for license |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> these examples may not be normally sane to actually do. I'm not a |
27 |
> server admin. They are just for demonstration |
28 |
> eg. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> /etc/portage/sets/server |
31 |
> |
32 |
> =net-www/apache-2.* M,K # use my pre-built binaries only when I say |
33 |
> www-servers/pound A # stay up to date |
34 |
> ... |
35 |
> |
36 |
> /etc/portage/sets/games |
37 |
> |
38 |
> games-action/bombermaze |
39 |
> games-action/descent3 L # automatically accept it's license |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
It seems like too much overloading to me. L is done with ACCEPT_LICENSE. |
43 |
K could be done with separate repositories (not overlays). M can already |
44 |
be done with profiles/masking. I can understand your motivation in |
45 |
tying parameters together, but I honestly think this is not the way to |
46 |
go about it. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Jason Stubbs |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |