| 1 |
Dnia 29 stycznia 2018 09:07:47 CET, Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 2 |
>On 01/25/2018 10:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
>> W dniu czw, 25.01.2018 o godzinie 10∶07 +0100, użytkownik Michael |
| 4 |
>> Haubenwallner napisał: |
| 5 |
>>> Hi, |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> ${Subject} ringing a bell here: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> dev-db/oracle-instantclient is fetch restricted. As a binary package |
| 10 |
>with |
| 11 |
>>> multiple USE options there's a bunch of files to download - even for |
| 12 |
>>> multiple archs when multilib is active. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> So in pkg_nofetch() I'm telling the user whether a file to download |
| 15 |
>is |
| 16 |
>>> "already here" or "still absent", by testing if $A exists in |
| 17 |
>$DISTDIR. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> With ${Subject}, I'm wondering if DISTDIR is created for pkg_nofetch |
| 20 |
>too. |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> You're doing the wrong thing then. DISTDIR is not allowed |
| 24 |
>> in pkg_nofetch(). |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>Is there a supported way to tell the user exactly which files are still |
| 27 |
>missing? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Sounds like a featurereq for Portage itself. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
>> Furthermore, you're touching files whose hashes have |
| 33 |
>> not been verified which is twice wrong. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
>Well - does portage actually provide unverified files in the shadow |
| 36 |
>DISTDIR? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
No. The phases in which the directory is present are only run if Manifest verification succeeds. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
>Thanks! |
| 42 |
>/haubi/ |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
Best regards, |
| 47 |
Michał Górny (by phone) |
Archives