Archives
Archives
| From: | "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Rafael Goncalves Martins <rafaelmartins@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Initial fetch() refactoring | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:00:27 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140127040022.GD14197@odin.tremily.us | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Initial fetch() refactoring by "W. Trevor King" |
||
| 1 | I've queued the following changes since v3: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | * Fix “we're relying” → “we're not relying” in the “Factor out |
| 4 | _get_uris” patch [1]. |
| 5 | * Use an “ebuild: fetch:” prefix for all patches [2]. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | in my fetch-refactor branch, but it's been fairly quiet since I pushed |
| 8 | v3 last Monday. Should I push v4 with just these commit message |
| 9 | changes, or should I let this cook a bit longer in case there are |
| 10 | further issues with v3? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Cheers, |
| 13 | Trevor |
| 14 | |
| 15 | [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/4079 |
| 16 | [2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/4102 |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 20 | For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |