| 1 |
Aloah, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Why is portage using such a strange naming scheme? Why are we only |
| 4 |
> > increasing ´build numbers´? As this seems to be a major release, why |
| 5 |
> > don´t we make a 2.1 out of it? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I don't think this is a "major" release as in "major version" but more as |
| 8 |
> in "big deal". From what I've heard, a major version change will be |
| 9 |
> reserved for a complete rewrite of Portage. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You mean, it needs a complete rewrite for a 2.1? |
| 12 |
If thats the case, why don´t we simply drop the ´2´? ;-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
take care, have fun |
| 15 |
/christian |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives