Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage rating in O'Reilly book
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:10:02
Message-Id: 43739AE2.9080608@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 I don't know whether all of you read my blog, but I wanted to make sure
5 you saw this:
6 http://www.livejournal.com/users/spyderous/60809.html?thread=89737#t89737.
7 It's a reply from the author of a book on why he rated our package
8 management at a 4 instead of a 5, and it gives some good ideas on where
9 users feel things could improve.
10
11 Feel free to ignore the binary packages bit, as that's more of a Gentoo
12 philosophical issue.
13
14 Thanks,
15 Donnie
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iD8DBQFDc5riXVaO67S1rtsRAkWBAJ9QkjDsltO24UrGW9oF2WKNkAL1cACfUDRY
20 OcCUgni8pLJ9CMxN/Bx1fC0=
21 =wOGZ
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 --
24 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage rating in O'Reilly book Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net>