Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/14/2010 04:36 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > This gets nasty... you're basically talking about the rpm equivalent
> > of EPOCH.
> >
> > Not a fan of an adhoc UUID (especially since it'll become standard
> > via portage doing it), but a *timestamp* for the build, labeled as
> > such, gets you what you want and is usable for other things- detecting
> > when to rebuild a scm package for example.
> >
> > That route gets my vote, and should also address your intentions.
> > ~harring
>
> Ok, then how about a vdb entry named CTIME that contains an integer
> number of seconds since the unix Epoch?
That would be UNIXTIME vs CTIME I'd think.
|
|
