Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-portage-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-portage-dev@g.o
From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Subject: Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:08:50 -0400
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?  
> I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any trouble with them.  
> Are there any arguments against making them default?

This is would qualify as core change. Please post this on the -dev ml.



> Zac
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFEOiRf/ejvha5XGaMRAn+kAJ9ieh37OjEwTriDQt/xPnmMGqEPsQCg7qvf
> XEcYhyzdGSDBj8HtH8QYJzk=
> =ge1C
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
-- Mike Frysinger
References:
should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Next by thread:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Previous by date:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Next by date:
Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-portage-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.