Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-portage-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-portage-dev@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:41:20 -0400
On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
> > FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any
> > trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default?
>
> This is would qualify as core change. Please post this on the -dev ml.

agreed, this is the inappropriate forum for such a change
-mike
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
-- Zac Medico
References:
should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
-- Zac Medico
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
-- Ned Ludd
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Next by thread:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Previous by date:
Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?
Next by date:
Re: should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-portage-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.