Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-portage-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-portage-dev@g.o
From: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Subject: Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:42:56 -0600
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:32:35PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Replace 2.1.0 with 2.2.0 and I'll agree.
Skipping 2.1 accomplishes what?

People asking, "whoah there, it's a later version then 2.1, where's 
the 2.1 functionality?" will still occur.

*cough* this is why alpha/feature releases should be date tagged 
against the branch point instead of the potential version. :)
~harring
Attachment:
pgpqJEh6GFEV5.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
-- Marius Mauch
References:
going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
-- Brian Harring
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
-- Brian Harring
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
-- Jason Stubbs
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
-- Jason Stubbs
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
-- Marius Mauch
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
Next by thread:
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
Previous by date:
Re: going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
Next by date:
Re: Plugin framework


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-portage-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.