Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-portage-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-portage-dev@g.o
From: Kito <kito@g.o>
Subject: Re: Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:48:20 -0600
On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and  
> PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?

Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not,  
can we twist the logic to make it so? :p

--Kito




-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
-- Jason Stubbs
References:
Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
-- Zac Medico
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-portage-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
Next by thread:
Re: Move PORTAGE_INST_UID and PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals?
Previous by date:
Enabling RSYNC_OPTIONS to be set in make.conf
Next by date:
Re: Enabling RSYNC_OPTIONS to be set in make.conf


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-portage-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.