m h wrote:
> Sorry, on further reading of my post, my questions weren't clear.  My
> first question is where is the current head of portage in CVS?  (I'd
> like to compare with what I have, and I'm not sure if I'm looking in
> the right place).
> 
> WRT implementing Prefix.  I'm looking at Michael's code, because I
> want to see what he has done.  (Which seems to be inline with what I
> need, may or may not align with the gentoo community at large, since
> nothing has been decided on that front).
> 
> Though, I noticed there was mention of Prefixed installs in yesterdays
> GWN (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/).  If anyone can
> elaborate on the efforts going on in that arena, I'm all ears.
> 
> matt
> 
> On 10/5/05, Alec Joseph Warner <warnera6@...> wrote:
> 
>>
>>m h wrote:
>>
>>>Hey Folks-
>>>
>>>I'm working on trying to get prefixed installs working.  (As such, I'm
>>>using some code kindly modified by Michael Haubenwallner. )  I'm now
>>>in python code (portage) and would like to compare what I have with
>>>gentoo proper.
>>>Is this the location of the latest up to date portage code (in CVS, I
>>>realized devs might have more "up to date" code on their boxes):
>>>http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/portage/pym/?root=gentoo-src
>>>
>>>I looked through the dev documentation but couldn't find anywhere
>>>where it stated the actual location of the code in CVS.  Any pointers
>>>would be great.
>>>
>>>thanks,
>>>matt
>>>
>>>ps.
>>>The issue I found is with pym/cache/fs_template.py.  If I'm running as
>>>root (GID = 0) then this fails:
>>>
>>>        def __init__(self, label, auxdbkeys, basepath=None, gid=-1,
>>>perms=0664, **config):
>>>               """throws InitializationError if needs args aren't specified"""
>>>               if not gid:
>>>                       raise
>>>cache_errors.InitializationError(self.__class__, "must specify gid!")
>>>
>>>Shouldn't the logic be "if gid != -1"?  I don't have access to a
>>>gentoo proper box right now...
>>>
>>
>>I thought that part of brian's domain stuff in Savior was to cover this.
>>  In either case no one should be writing any real code at this point
>>since no one has agreed on any sane way to pull this off.  There needs
>>to be plenty of healthy discussion the pro's and con's of how things
>>should be done in regards to *-prefix.
>>
>>In conclusion, if you think this will be 'easy', think again ;)
>>
>>PS.  However starting discussion on how exactly this would work might be
>>a nice thing to do ;)
>>--
>>gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list
>>
>>
> 
> 
* Now talking on #gentoo-portage
* Topic for #gentoo-portage is: 2.0.53_rc3 released; please test || 
emerge development only; ebuild dev questions go to #gentoo-dev-help and 
usage questions go to #gentoo || anonsvn access: svn co 
svn://twobit.net/portage/, rewrite is at main/branches/savior, 2.1 is at 
main/trunk, 2.0 is at main/branches/2.0 and sandbox is at path-sandbox/trunk

IRC is your friend here ;)  In this case you probably want the rewrite, 
which is from what I recall, a complete rewrite...so nothing of Haubi's 
is in it.  Brian will definately know more there than myself, I haven't 
touched it in quite some time, and I doubt RL will let me for a bit :P
-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list