| 1 |
hi there. |
| 2 |
i marked binutils-2.13.0.90.18 stable for ppc and unmasked it in |
| 3 |
profiles/default-1.4-ppc/packages. it's unmasked on ppc because the KDE |
| 4 |
3.1 compile breaks without it. i've compiled kde 3.1 and gnome 2.2 |
| 5 |
against it. gerk has compiled kde 3.1 (and lots more stuff) against it. |
| 6 |
it seems to be very stable thus far. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
as for it being masked, you may have hit a bad rsync mirror. this exact |
| 9 |
thing happened to me this morning. i did another emerge rsync (different |
| 10 |
mirror) and the problem was gone. the mirror i had trouble with was in |
| 11 |
japan. i've written our rsync guy about this. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
everything should have gone smoothly. you just got bitten by a stale |
| 14 |
mirror. |
| 15 |
nall. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 10:43, Stephan van Maris wrote: |
| 19 |
> I did a fresh 'emerge sync' a few minutes ago, and tried to update 'world'. |
| 20 |
> Apparently, gcc-3.2.2 requires binutils-2.13.90.0.18 (I'm running ~ppc) but |
| 21 |
> portage thinks it's masked. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> After looking around in the ebuild (most of the time adding 'ppc' to the |
| 24 |
> ebuild does the trick) I found it somewhat strange that binutils-2.13.90.0.18 |
| 25 |
> was marked 'ppc' (stable) but marked unstable for every other platform. I |
| 26 |
> looked in packages.mask and there are 2 versions masked, but not the version |
| 27 |
> I'm trying to install. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> In /usr/portage/profiles/default-ppc-1.4/packages I found out that all |
| 30 |
> binutils >=2.13.90.0.4 are masked. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Why is that? How can an ebuild be marked stable on ppc and still be in the |
| 33 |
> masked packages file? I assume the 'ppc' in the ebuild is a typo and should |
| 34 |
> be (at least) '~ppc' ... Just curious ... |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Greetings, |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Stephan van Maris |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> -- |
| 42 |
> gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 43 |
> |
Archives