Gentoo Archives: gentoo-ppc-dev

From: David <david@×××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentooppc-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentooppc-dev] Uncompress missing in base system?
Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 13:12:41
Message-Id: 3CD57616.8070909@trailheadcoffee.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentooppc-dev] Uncompress missing in base system? by Olivier Reisch
1 Yup, you're right. It's that darn $ARCH flag - works for some things,
2 not for others. Fix is in the works. Thanks for spotting this one.
3
4 David
5
6 Olivier Reisch wrote:
7
8 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 >Hash: SHA1
10 >
11 >On Sunday 05 May 2002 19:51, David wrote:
12 >
13 >
14 >>Hi Olivier,
15 >>
16 >>ncompress is listed as an "RDEPEND" for those builds - i.e. needed for
17 >>building, but (when Portage is a little more advanced), disposable once
18 >>the package is compiled and installed. Your suggestion about adding it
19 >>to the base system may still hold (though I assume there's a good reason
20 >>ncompress is used for the ppc files instead of gunzip); but the ebuilds
21 >>should work fine, since they'll pull ncompress in first. If they don't,
22 >>something is broken!
23 >>
24 >>David
25 >>
26 >>
27 >
28 >Something is broken.
29 >
30 >- --
31 >________________________________________________
32 >Olivier Reisch doctomoe@××××××.org
33 >TuxPPC Site Director
34 >http://www.tuxppc.org
35 >The number one user resource for Linux on PPC.
36 >
37 >For safe mail, get my PGP Key:
38 >http://perso.wanadoo.fr/olivier.reisch/oreisch_public_key.gpg
39 >________________________________________________
40 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 >Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
42 >
43 >iD8DBQE81XIbtYcLvEeHIXURAvOCAKDHlTTdXGCy5tMQGoqntGBmo7M1RQCg2WCK
44 >R1SFcge7UuFsdG1vPztRM+w=
45 >=UjHI
46 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
47 >
48 >_______________________________________________
49 >gentooppc-dev mailing list
50 >gentooppc-dev@g.o
51 >http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentooppc-dev
52 >
53 >.
54 >
55 >
56 >