| 1 |
Well, basically ffmpeg people use my fix in their code. |
| 2 |
Sadly they didn't change the name of the static functions... |
| 3 |
(Credits to the original idea are due to Michel Lespinasse, I just |
| 4 |
extended the vpem->mergel to the other datatype.) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
If you want to remove or change the fix I put just edit your altivec.h |
| 7 |
include changing the function names. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Regards |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Magnus Damm wrote: |
| 13 |
> On 27 Jul 2003 19:00:03 +0200 |
| 14 |
> Bartosch Pixa <darkspecter@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>>well basicaly with our fixed gcc you shouldn't need your ffmpeg fix |
| 18 |
>>anymore. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I understand that, but how do I know that the version of gcc I run |
| 22 |
> is the pristine "buggy" gcc or if it's patched with the gentoo-patches? |
| 23 |
> Is some gentoo-specific constant set that I could check? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Well, never mind - I could change the symbols used by my workaround. |
| 26 |
> That solves it, but I wonder if that is the right thing(tm). |
| 27 |
> The right way would probably be to check for buggy altivec in configure. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Thanks. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> / magnus |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Luca Barbato |
| 41 |
Developer |
| 42 |
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives