1 |
i'm curious how explicit package keywords have to be. for instance, if |
2 |
package A depends on package B and package B has "-ppc", should package |
3 |
A also get "-ppc" (perhaps with a comment as to what dependency is |
4 |
causing it to be being -ppc'ed)? |
5 |
|
6 |
i realize that there's no real harm here, since dependencies will take |
7 |
care of not letting A be installed. i'm just curious if we're trying to |
8 |
get rid of all instances of ppc not being addressed in KEYWORDS (ie: |
9 |
making sure that either "ppc" or "-ppc" is in the KEYWORDS of all |
10 |
ebuilds). |
11 |
|
12 |
if we're being explicit, the following should get -ppc since they depend |
13 |
on sys-apps/apmd, (which is -ppc): |
14 |
|
15 |
gnome-extra/battstat |
16 |
x11-misc/bbapm |
17 |
|
18 |
nall. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
nall <nall@××××××××××××××××.net> |