Hi David

Thanks, I ended up removing the linux-sources from the deps in that ebuild
(in the words of kainz lsof does _not_ depend on linux-sources).

The other thing that I was wondering is how things like linux-sources are
going to affect us ppc users (in the new layout isn't it
sys-kernel/ppc-sources ?)

Other than that minor issue and the fact that sys-kernel/ppc-sources didnt
have a digest the clean build is going smooth (doing kernel as we speak).

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Chamberlain" <daybird@g.o>
To: <gentooppc-dev@g.o>
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: [gentooppc-dev] problem with emerge system (lsof) in new
portage


> I guess this needs a fix if we're to follow the standard gentoo install
> procedure.  Meanwhile you can get around this (I think) by emerging
> sys-kernel/ppc-sources first, before your system.  This will take a
> while, since it will pull in perl as a dependency.  Or you could edit
> /usr/portage/profile/default-ppc/packages and remove the * in front of
> sys-apps/lsof.  After you have your system (minus lsof) and ppc-sources,
> put it back in and emerge lsof.
>
> **Note to Pieter & Kain: a quick grep of portage reveals no packages
> depending on lsof - can we just remove it from our base system?  Is this
> a problem with the install iso or with portage?
>
> David
>
>
> Mark Guertin wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > Building abrand new system today, just finished rsyncing the new
> > portage from cvs.gentoo.org, and it seems that when I emerge system
> > that sys-apps/losf-4.60-r1 is complaining about
> > virtual/linux-sources.  I will investigate further.
> >
> > Mark
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentooppc-dev mailing list
> gentooppc-dev@g.o
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentooppc-dev
>