| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 21:29 -0500, Sean Sullivan wrote: |
| 2 |
> > |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> >The plan was to originally use parted (which I still prefer). I made an |
| 5 |
> >ebuild for redhat's parted python bindings (in bugzilla), but it isn't |
| 6 |
> >in portage yet (needs a patch and version bump on parted). HOWEVER, I |
| 7 |
> >don't believe parted supports all arches. Specifically, I believe |
| 8 |
> >parted has "minors" hard coded as type int, which doesn't work on one |
| 9 |
> >arch (I believe alpha) as it uses letter based minors. I could be wrong |
| 10 |
> >though... But to your knowledge parted DOES work on ppc? Anyone else? |
| 11 |
> >Does parted work on your arch? Thanks! |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> >Nathaniel |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> parted-1.6.6 built clean and seems to perform well on my iBook. |
| 18 |
It is possible to make the boot partition with parted (as oppossed to |
| 19 |
mac-fdisk)? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Nathaniel |
Archives