| 1 |
Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jason wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Close. No, I wasn't checking the logs (because I'm shotgunning through |
| 4 |
>> all the ebuilds for gcc-4.3.0 till one works, hopefully). Yes, I was |
| 5 |
>> exporting I_PROMISE_NOT_TO_BE_A_DUMBASS=1.... |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> However, On closer inspection, when I did 'crossdev --g |
| 8 |
>> 4.3.0_alphaYYYYMMDD ... powerpc64' crossdev wasn't using the version of |
| 9 |
>> gcc I specified. It was using the latest, which doesn't build |
| 10 |
>> successfully. So now I'm trying to figure out how to specify the |
| 11 |
>> _exact_ ebuild. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Please send me the error log, it's quite strange that it fails. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
[error log sent offline] |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Just an update, I fixed the version thing in crossdev. Somewhere along |
| 19 |
the line I (yeah, problem between keyboard and chair) added some kung-fu |
| 20 |
to package.{mask,unmask,keywords} to get gcc-4.3.0. This was back |
| 21 |
before I was specifying the version to crossdev. Upon review of the |
| 22 |
crossdev code, I saw that if I specified the version number, it should |
| 23 |
do the mask/unmasking on its own. Sure nough. Undo my hack and the |
| 24 |
version specification works. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Well, so far both of these have failed: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
# crossdev --b 2.17 --g 4.3.0 --k 2.6.20-r2 --l 2.5 powerpc64 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
The above pulls in gcc-4.3.0_alpha20070406. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
# crossdev --b 2.17 --g 4.3.0_alpha20070330 --k 2.6.20-r2 --l 2.5 powerpc64 |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Back to the grinder. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Jason. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-ppc-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives