1 |
I have sent a reply only to the original poster by mistake, so I will |
2 |
repeat my correction to the whole list (maybe somebody will find it |
3 |
useful). |
4 |
|
5 |
At 15:20 -0600 on 2004-11-9 Daejuan Jacobs wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Yeah, those first 5 partitions are only for OS X/9. |
8 |
|
9 |
Correction: only for OS 9, OS X does not need them (save for the first |
10 |
partition that is needed by everybody--since it is the partition table |
11 |
itself--and gets created by mac-fdisk and similar). In fact newer OS |
12 |
X disk utilities do not create these by default anymore, one has to |
13 |
check "install compatibility drivers" or something like this to have |
14 |
them. |
15 |
|
16 |
If you don't plan to use OS 9 (or plan to use OS 9 only from the OS |
17 |
X's Classic environment or MOL) then you can safely ignore all of them |
18 |
and just initialize your replacement disk using mac-fdisk. |
19 |
|
20 |
Cheers, |
21 |
Stefan |
22 |
|
23 |
P.S. Admins, would you consider pointing the default reply-to header |
24 |
to the list instead of the original poster, many times I just hit |
25 |
reply and the message goes to the poster instead of the list at large. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as |
29 |
it isn't, it ain't. That's logic. |
30 |
--Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-ppc-user@g.o mailing list |