1 |
Saas nähdä meneekö ihan puihin, mutta rupesin asentelemaan OpenBSD:tä |
2 |
tähän iMaccii kun sain eilen sen levyn takaisin. |
3 |
|
4 |
-Janne |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
gentooppc-user-request@g.o kirjoittaa tiistaina, 22. lokakuuta |
8 |
2002, kello 20:01: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Send gentooppc-user mailing list submissions to |
11 |
> gentooppc-user@g.o |
12 |
> |
13 |
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit |
14 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentooppc-user |
15 |
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to |
16 |
> gentooppc-user-request@g.o |
17 |
> |
18 |
> You can reach the person managing the list at |
19 |
> gentooppc-user-admin@g.o |
20 |
> |
21 |
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific |
22 |
> than "Re: Contents of gentooppc-user digest..." |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Today's Topics: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> 1. RE: Excessive disk use? (marciot) |
28 |
> 2. RE: Re: Success: Freeswan on PPC (Was: What's special about |
29 |
> "sys-kernel/ppc-sources"...) (marciot) |
30 |
> 3. Re: Excessive disk use? (Calum Selkirk) |
31 |
> 4. Strange entry in /proc/cpuinfo (Ben Ricker) |
32 |
> |
33 |
> --__--__-- |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Message: 1 |
36 |
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:42:45 -0600 |
37 |
> From: marciot <marciot@×××××××××××××××.edu> |
38 |
> To: Mark Guertin <gerk@g.o> |
39 |
> Cc: gentooppc-user@g.o |
40 |
> Subject: RE: [gentooppc-user] Excessive disk use? |
41 |
> |
42 |
>> Actually read the make.conf again... if you are using gcc 3.2 based |
43 |
>> setup then you should NOT use mcpu with that machine. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Yeah. You're correct. For some odd reason yesterday thought I had a |
46 |
> G3, even |
47 |
> though I know it isn't the case. Wishful thinking, I suppose :) |
48 |
> |
49 |
> But I do uncomment: |
50 |
> |
51 |
> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -fsigned-char" |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Right? This one was commented out before -- I had no CFLAGS at all (the |
54 |
> make.conf file ships without any by default). Should I be concerned? |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Marcio Luis Teixeira |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
> --__--__-- |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Message: 2 |
63 |
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:52:32 -0600 |
64 |
> From: marciot <marciot@×××××××××××××××.edu> |
65 |
> To: Christophe Tournery <christophe.tournery@××××.ch> |
66 |
> Cc: gentooppc-user@g.o |
67 |
> Subject: RE: [gentooppc-user] Re: Success: Freeswan on PPC (Was: |
68 |
> What's special about "sys-kernel/ppc-sources"...) |
69 |
> |
70 |
>> Well, if this might convince you to create a ppc-crypto-sources, I |
71 |
>> have |
72 |
>> also successfully compiled freeswan 1.98b against the default |
73 |
>> ppc-sources |
74 |
>> (2.4.19-r6). The only problem I had was when compiling the kernel |
75 |
>> using |
76 |
>> the makefile provided by freeswan. 'make menugo' did compile something |
77 |
>> (took quite some time) but it failed after a while, |
78 |
> |
79 |
> I think this may have happened for me too. I forgot about it. The same |
80 |
> work |
81 |
> around worked for me, though I hadn't realized it was a workaround (I |
82 |
> thought |
83 |
> it was some network hickup or something :) |
84 |
> |
85 |
> However, I've not actually *tested* the install with a real VPN yet, |
86 |
> so I |
87 |
> can't comment on whether it is functional or not. The freeswan config |
88 |
> and docs |
89 |
> look like greek to me and I'm waiting on some more info from our |
90 |
> network admin |
91 |
> to figure out how to get this beast configured :) |
92 |
> |
93 |
> If anyone knows how to configure freeswan to interface with either a |
94 |
> Cisco VPN |
95 |
> 3000 concentrator, let me know :) |
96 |
> |
97 |
> Marcio Luis Teixeira |
98 |
> |
99 |
> |
100 |
> |
101 |
> --__--__-- |
102 |
> |
103 |
> Message: 3 |
104 |
> From: "Calum Selkirk" <cselkirk@g.o> |
105 |
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:48:06 +0200 |
106 |
> To: gentooppc-user@g.o |
107 |
> Reply-To: Calum Selkirk <cselkirk@g.o> |
108 |
> Subject: [gentooppc-user] Re: Excessive disk use? |
109 |
> |
110 |
> |
111 |
> --yBTw3iMQSKDA2CaE |
112 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
113 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
114 |
> |
115 |
> * Marcio Luis Teixeira [marciot@×××××××××××××××.edu] [2002-10-21 01:52 |
116 |
> -0600]: |
117 |
> |
118 |
>> On Monday 21 October 2002 12:30 pm, Mark Guertin wrote: |
119 |
> |
120 |
>>> You don't have anything to worry about really, the default CFLAGS |
121 |
>>> would be pretty much the same as the suggested cflags in make.conf |
122 |
>>> in your case. |
123 |
>> |
124 |
>> The "make.conf" file suggests: |
125 |
>> |
126 |
>> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -mcpu=603e -mpowerpc-gfxopt -fsigned-char" |
127 |
>> |
128 |
>> (where I replaced 750 with 603e, as per the instructions) |
129 |
>> |
130 |
>> That line was commented out. You say that these are equivalent to the |
131 |
>> defaults? I expected that the defaults would compile for the 601, no? |
132 |
>> Is the "-02" option on by default? (where do I find these defaults?) |
133 |
> |
134 |
> The defaults can be found in: |
135 |
> |
136 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/defualt-ppc-1.4/make.defaults |
137 |
> |
138 |
> (for a 1.4-r1 release) |
139 |
> |
140 |
> The /etc/make.conf is simply a means whereby users can override the |
141 |
> defaults. |
142 |
> |
143 |
> best |
144 |
> |
145 |
> cal |
146 |
> |
147 |
> --yBTw3iMQSKDA2CaE |
148 |
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature |
149 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
150 |
> |
151 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
152 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
153 |
> |
154 |
> iD8DBQE9tTr2CnVTDMCvVYgRAt1BAJ96c3dVYnFtyKWsTwhYUXUEUVrnLQCgkEgH |
155 |
> qFH+19RpgRTzpN4d0+nek3k= |
156 |
> =c9Y3 |
157 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
158 |
> |
159 |
> --yBTw3iMQSKDA2CaE-- |
160 |
> |
161 |
> --__--__-- |
162 |
> |
163 |
> Message: 4 |
164 |
> From: Ben Ricker <bricker@×××××××.com> |
165 |
> To: gentooppc-user@g.o |
166 |
> Date: 22 Oct 2002 11:27:12 -0500 |
167 |
> Subject: [gentooppc-user] Strange entry in /proc/cpuinfo |
168 |
> |
169 |
> I have a PowerComputing PowerBase 240 with a Powerlogix Powerforce G4 |
170 |
> upgrade daughter card. I have seen some VERY slow compile times; |
171 |
> mozilla |
172 |
> took something like 10 hours to compile. I think the problem lies in |
173 |
> kernel not recognizing the true CPU clock speed (I have it set at |
174 |
> around |
175 |
> 300MHz). |
176 |
> |
177 |
> Here is a cat of /proc/cpuinfo. Note the 60MHz clock speed! Anybody |
178 |
> know |
179 |
> what is up with this? |
180 |
> |
181 |
> processor : 0 |
182 |
> cpu : 7400, altivec supported |
183 |
> temperature : 26-28 C (uncalibrated) |
184 |
> clock : 60MHz |
185 |
> revision : 2.9 (pvr 000c 0209) |
186 |
> bogomips : 638.97 |
187 |
> |
188 |
> total bogomips : 638.97 |
189 |
> machine : Power Macintosh |
190 |
> motherboard : AAPL,e407 MacRISC |
191 |
> detected as : 35 (Alchemy) |
192 |
> pmac flags : 00000000 |
193 |
> memory : 160MB |
194 |
> pmac-generation : OldWorld |
195 |
> |
196 |
> Ben Ricker |
197 |
> |
198 |
> |
199 |
> |
200 |
> --__--__-- |
201 |
> |
202 |
> _______________________________________________ |
203 |
> gentooppc-user mailing list |
204 |
> gentooppc-user@g.o |
205 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentooppc-user |
206 |
> |
207 |
> |
208 |
> End of gentooppc-user Digest |