| 1 |
On 11/07/03 20:40 +0200, Calum Selkirk wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Pieter Van den Abeele [pvdabeel@g.o] [2003-07-11 19:55 +0200]: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > I'll remerge both and try to reproduce the error - azarah feel free to |
| 5 |
> > drop me an email if you need something tested :-) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It wasn't azarah but luca who marked this stable. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Indeed, also mentioned in the Changelog (I've read) and I can remember lu |
| 10 |
asking me about this on irc. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As illustrated by my previous email, I've been using it for a while now, |
| 13 |
without any problems. The ebuild was marked stable one month ago, I have |
| 14 |
seen nil bugreports on it, except for this one, and we're on it - doing QA. |
| 15 |
xfree-r3 was last changed 3 days ago and is not marked stable on ppc. |
| 16 |
I don't see how lu could possibly have predicted one month ago that xfree-r3 was |
| 17 |
going to break using the binutils he was masking stable after a long time in |
| 18 |
unstable without problems (even today - see my previous email). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Instead of pointing fingers, I'd prefer a bug report that gives us a chance |
| 21 |
to look into this situation and in the end help the user out. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Even if the bug is an upstream bug, we'll report it upstream, so don't |
| 24 |
hesitate bombing us with this kind of feedback, but please no finger |
| 25 |
pointing. <insert stuff about gentoo developers being unpaid volunteers here> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Pieter |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Pieter Van den Abeele |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~pvdabeel/ |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF238673E |
| 36 |
Key fingerprint = F29C C550 54CD 1196 6723 EDC3 9B0D 4EA7 F238 673E |
Archives