Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-ppc-user
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-ppc-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-ppc-user@g.o
From: Carl Hudkins <carl@...>
Subject: Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:22:33 -0400
On Tue June 28 2005 16:34, Stefan Bruda wrote:

> Oh, of course therm_adt746x won't load, sorry for not mentioning it.
> There is as far as I know no option in the kernel config for thermal
> management on these machines.  I am clueless as to why is the fan
> behaving differently, it simply shouldn't.

 I'm not an expert here, but could it be the kernel is not using some kind of 
CPU idling when it's not busy?  Maybe the CPU is actually running hotter than 
it used to.  Just an idea, may not be founded in fact.  ;)

-- 
// Carl Hudkins :: Jabber  yther@... :: PGP 50238D9E
//
//               ==]  What would Jeeves do?  [==
// 
//                            (X-Spam-To: collapsar@...)
-- 
gentoo-ppc-user@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
-- Alexander Meyer
References:
OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
-- Alexander Meyer
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
-- Colin Leroy
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
-- Stefan Bruda
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-ppc-user: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
Next by thread:
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
Previous by date:
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6
Next by date:
Re: OT: thermal management diff 2.4 vs. 2.6


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-ppc-user mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.