Gentoo Archives: gentoo-ppc-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-ppc-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-ppc-user] Sound
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:10:37
Message-Id: 20050811100933.56044c9b@hactar.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-ppc-user] Sound by Mike S
1 On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:57:36 -0700, Mike S wrote:
2
3 > well I checked the /etc/make.conf file, and yes you were right
4 > (almost) I am not sure what the difference is, but I am sure that I
5 > will find out sooner or later, instead of CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK variable
6 > set to something I had CONFIG_PROTECT="-*". So for the time being I
7 > just commented that line out, and will maybe change it once I learn
8 > more about it.
9
10 A wise move. It is not a good idea to add settings you don't fully
11 understand to a system-critical config file :(
12
13
14 > I will investigate the difference between CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK and
15 > CONFIG_PROTECT and see what the difference is (if any), or if they are
16 > merely the same variable with different names,
17
18 In fact, they are complete opposites of each other. See man make.conf for
19 more details.
20
21 CONFIG_PROTECT = [space delimited list of dirs]
22 All directories that are defined here will have "config file
23 protection" enabled for them. For more information, please see
24 `emerge --help config`.
25
26 CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK = [space delimited list of dirs] All directories that
27 are defined here will have "config file protection" disabled for
28 them. For more information, please see `emerge --help config`.
29
30
31 --
32 Neil Bothwick
33
34 Me? FAT? No, just horizontally disproportionate...