1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hi. |
5 |
|
6 |
The following document is part of a mail I've sent to the proctors@ |
7 |
alias 6 weeks ago and that was my contribution to a discussion we were |
8 |
having about the CoC and the proctors. |
9 |
At the time I didn't submit that document here, because there was no |
10 |
such ml and we were still having an initial internal discussion. |
11 |
Since the team has yet to publish any document on this due to a variety |
12 |
of reasons and that we've been accused of not working on this issue (I |
13 |
say we, as a former member of the team), I think it's important to show |
14 |
that claim to be false. |
15 |
This document, "Proctors - Questions", and my view on this issue, |
16 |
"Proctors - Answers" are also available on their original format on |
17 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jmbsvicetto/proctors/ |
18 |
|
19 |
In this document I tried to raise the questions I thought the proctors |
20 |
needed to address or clarify in order to be able to carry out their work. |
21 |
This is my personal and humble opinion. Although some members agreed |
22 |
with most of my questions / answers, these 2 documents in no way |
23 |
constitute the team's opinion at that moment or now, let alone define |
24 |
their policy. |
25 |
|
26 |
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
27 |
Gentoo Proctors |
28 |
|
29 |
General Applicability / Enforcement Questions (to be answered by council?) |
30 |
|
31 |
What medium/channels? |
32 |
Initial proposal included all #gentoo-* IRC channels, the MLs, Bugzilla |
33 |
and Forums. |
34 |
IRC is problematic both technically, users can evade bans and we can't |
35 |
control all #gentoo-* channels. So, what channels? Do we want proctors |
36 |
to moderate #gentoo-dev? |
37 |
#gentoo-chat / OTW - I've asked this before and the answers that were |
38 |
provided would in my view imply a change in the current status of those |
39 |
channels |
40 |
|
41 |
What powers? |
42 |
What philosophy: punishments/preventive action? |
43 |
What are the available options for the different mediums (we need the |
44 |
input from infra) |
45 |
Do we want/accept penalties/remedies crossing mediums? (Do we want a ban |
46 |
from forums to extend to bugzilla?) |
47 |
Do we want/accept permanent bans? |
48 |
|
49 |
What audience? |
50 |
Do we address users and devs? (council said everyone) |
51 |
What powers can/will the proctors have over devs? |
52 |
Do proctors act on devs directly or through devrel? |
53 |
|
54 |
What proctors? |
55 |
Are proctors elected or appointed and by whom? |
56 |
Are members elected/appointed for a mandate or for ad-eternum? |
57 |
Who controls the proctors? (who watches the watchman?) |
58 |
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
59 |
|
60 |
My answers to the final section on "what proctors", included some |
61 |
possibilities that clearly go beyond the current Gentoo metastructure |
62 |
and that I felt could / should be applied to other teams as well. |
63 |
I can conceive them as being the basis for a proposal to restructure the |
64 |
current organization, for example by requiring certain teams leads to be |
65 |
elected and or by defining a system of checks and balances that tries to |
66 |
ensure the council can define a direction for Gentoo but at the same |
67 |
time limiting their ability to staff teams. To be clear, this search for |
68 |
checks and balances was in no way motivated by any feeling of abuse of |
69 |
the current council or any of its members. |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
- -- |
73 |
Regards, |
74 |
|
75 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
76 |
Gentoo- forums / Userrel |
77 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
78 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) |
79 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
80 |
|
81 |
iD8DBQFGaIjbcAWygvVEyAIRAncnAJ4o4FhY2eIkBkYq62I9N+ThnSp3/QCeN7cJ |
82 |
F37XlpKnJQxRfegc4//0BwA= |
83 |
=AKU5 |
84 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
85 |
-- |
86 |
gentoo-proctors@g.o mailing list |