Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-proctors
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-proctors: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-proctors@g.o
From: Ranjit Singh <ranjit@...>
Subject: Re: Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:16:09 +0100
On Thursday 07 June 2007 23:38, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> The following document is part of a mail I've sent to the proctors@
> alias 6 weeks ago and that was my contribution to a discussion we were
> having about the CoC and the proctors.
Thanks for sharing the info. It's nice to see some transparency (although Mr 
Marples' attempts to be transparent shows the difficulty.)

> At the time I didn't submit that document here, because there was no
> such ml and we were still having an initial internal discussion.
Understood and perfectly reasonable.

> Since the team has yet to publish any document on this due to a variety
> of reasons and that we've been accused of not working on this issue (I
> say we, as a former member of the team), I think it's important to show
> that claim to be false.
Er ok, although that makes the above a bit less of a given ;) Wrt to 
detractors, I have a feeling that many of those will be people who would be 
affected by the work of the team, and their cohorts. In my opinion all mail 
to proctors should be publically accessible. After all, it is sent in clear 
text to an official complaints address.

> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Gentoo Proctors
>
> General Applicability / Enforcement Questions (to be answered by council?)
>
> What medium/channels?
Any and all with gentoo in the name. (R) anyone?

> What powers?
Equivalent to forum admin.

> What philosophy: punishments/preventive action?
Ditto.

> What are the available options for the different mediums (we need the
> input from infra)
FFS you're programmers!

> Do we want/accept penalties/remedies crossing mediums? (Do we want a ban
> from forums to extend to bugzilla?)
Yes.

> Do we want/accept permanent bans?
>
Yes.

> What audience?
> Do we address users and devs? (council said everyone)
++

> What powers can/will the proctors have over devs?
What? As above.

> Do proctors act on devs directly or through devrel?
>
Directly with input from kloeri and g2boojum

> What proctors?
Er.

> Are proctors elected or appointed and by whom?
Elected from pool: forum admins, devrel and council.

> Are members elected/appointed for a mandate or for ad-eternum?
Mandate. wtf asked that?

> Who controls the proctors? (who watches the watchman?)
Er we do. Got it? :)

<snip blah>
Thanks for some sanity :)
Flame on paludis minions!
Attachment:
pgpVN1Z8BG556.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers
-- Wulf C. Krueger
References:
Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers
-- Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-proctors: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers
Next by thread:
Re: Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers
Previous by date:
Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers
Next by date:
Re: Proctors - An RFC about their role/powers


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-proctors mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.