Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-proctors
It should be rather obvious by now that I don't think we need the
proctors.
Nevertheless, some points made below need to be addressed.
On Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:16:09 AM Ranjit Singh wrote:
> > Do we want/accept penalties/remedies crossing mediums? (Do we want a
> > ban from forums to extend to bugzilla?)
> Yes.
No. If the offender does behave on other mediums, why should he be banned
from those?
> > Do we want/accept permanent bans?
> Yes.
No! Everyone deserves another chance.
> > What audience?
> > Do we address users and devs? (council said everyone)
> ++
For devs we have DevRel.
> > What powers can/will the proctors have over devs?
> What? As above.
None.
> > Do proctors act on devs directly or through devrel?
> Directly with input from kloeri and g2boojum
For obvious reasons (kloeri retired), there should be no personal
involvement but groups only.
> > Are proctors elected or appointed and by whom?
> Elected from pool: forum admins, devrel and council.
Elected. From the developer community.
> > Who controls the proctors? (who watches the watchman?)
> Er we do. Got it? :)
The council and the developer community as they can vote for someone else
for the next term.
> Flame on paludis minions!
Would you kindly leave this out of here? Thanks!
Best regards, Wulf
|
|