Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council?
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:20:39
Message-Id: 4E488238.4070004@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council? by Mike Frysinger
On 08/14/2011 10:01 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this has come up multiple times in the past as a concern, but in practice has > never been an issue.
constant problem with devrel bugs lately, with people having such powers, acting as if they didn't need to listen to other anymore (including members from his own team)
> if members feel like there's going to be a conflict from > themselves, they can recuse themselves. this has happened once or twice. i > dont see any value in laying out red tape for an issue that has never caused a > problem.
in developer relation bugs, the accused should also be allowed to recuse such double members; as "i'm not saying this as devrel member but..." "i'm not saying this as council member but..." is constantly being used as weapon by selected people, making the whole process of devrel unfair when other members get semi ignored
> -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council? "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-project] Should DevRel members be in Council? Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>