1 |
On 08/14/2011 10:01 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> this has come up multiple times in the past as a concern, but in practice has |
3 |
> never been an issue. |
4 |
|
5 |
constant problem with devrel bugs lately, with people having such |
6 |
powers, acting as if they didn't need to listen to other anymore |
7 |
(including members from his own team) |
8 |
|
9 |
> if members feel like there's going to be a conflict from |
10 |
> themselves, they can recuse themselves. this has happened once or twice. i |
11 |
> dont see any value in laying out red tape for an issue that has never caused a |
12 |
> problem. |
13 |
|
14 |
in developer relation bugs, the accused should also be allowed to recuse |
15 |
such double members; as |
16 |
|
17 |
"i'm not saying this as devrel member but..." |
18 |
"i'm not saying this as council member but..." |
19 |
|
20 |
is constantly being used as weapon by selected people, making the whole |
21 |
process of devrel unfair when other members get semi ignored |
22 |
|
23 |
> -mike |