1 |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:47:17PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Here's another question for the nominees. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Back when I was on the Council, there was a time that I've been |
7 |
> approached that my behavior is not appropriate for a public Gentoo |
8 |
> representative, even if the comments in question had nothing to do with |
9 |
> the Council matters. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Today, I would like to ask: do you think that Council members should |
12 |
> lead the community by example? Should their reputation be untainted, |
13 |
> should they be able to withhold their anger even when they believe they |
14 |
> have reasons enough to attack others? Should they not participate |
15 |
> in flames, unless only to extinguish them? |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
I don't believe anyone should *attack* others. As far as being a "pillar |
19 |
of the community" let us remember that each of us are human. We have |
20 |
faults, but overall individuals should strive to lead by example. If |
21 |
they are in the wrong then they should take responsibility. If they |
22 |
wronged someone else then they should make that apology to them. |
23 |
|
24 |
> Is it considered acceptable that a nominee for election calls other |
25 |
> developers inhumane or delusional on the public mailing lists? Is it |
26 |
> good that he throws false accusations without verifying them? |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Of course not, but again we are human and we often let things get the |
30 |
best of us. The appropriate course of action here is to right that |
31 |
wrong... some will and some won't. |
32 |
|
33 |
> Is it fine that yet another nominee runs an election campaign focused |
34 |
> on attacking other developers, and apparently trying to get votes |
35 |
> by finding 'a common enemy'? |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Should such people become the public faces of Gentoo? Or should they |
38 |
> maybe be professional enough to withdraw their candidacy after |
39 |
> discrediting themselves in the middle of election? |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
A choice to remove oneself from the election is purely up to that |
43 |
individual. Should the circumstances be significant enough (and without |
44 |
going over "what if's?") then they should absolutely do so. |
45 |
|
46 |
"to err is human..." |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Cheers, |
50 |
Aaron |