Archives
Archives
| From: | Tony Vroon <chainsaw@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 | ||
| Date: | Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:15:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1373055304.7405.35.camel@adrastea | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 15:47 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: |
| 2 | > I would be forever in your debt if toolchain were on eapi 5 and had |
| 3 | > proper subslot deps. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | It certainly sounds like a much better approach to incrementally improve |
| 6 | the toolchain eclass rather than trying to forcibly invalidate EAPI 0 |
| 7 | through a council decree. |
| 8 | Once the actual use tapers off to where a removal makes sense... we may |
| 9 | still end up on a tree with minimum EAPI 5 this year. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Regards, |
| 12 | Tony V. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 | "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o> |