1 |
On 01-08-2011 23:10:43 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
2 |
> >> Ok, thanks. Am I correct by summarising this point as simply a vote |
3 |
> >> for transferring the cloak responsibility to devrel? |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Yes I think this is pretty much the gist. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> No, I'm sorry but that's not the point. |
8 |
> First, these users issues need to be moved to "community relations", the |
9 |
> project I and Petteri have been talking about to unite DevRel and UserRel. |
10 |
> In any case, the 2 issues at stake here are: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> 1. Do we want / support gentoo/user cloaks or not? If so, what is needed |
13 |
> for anyone to get them. |
14 |
|
15 |
I think the council in general should only decide on the first question. |
16 |
The second one should not be an open discussion, but instead |
17 |
pre-discussed such that the council can simply vote on the whole (yes |
18 |
support cloaks, and like this) |
19 |
|
20 |
> 2. What should gentoo/contributor cloaks mean? Should they be reserved |
21 |
> to ATs/HTs/other official project members? How can they be requested / |
22 |
> validated? |
23 |
|
24 |
This seems totally out of the domain of council to me. We have |
25 |
specialised sub-projects to deal with these kinds of grey areas. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Fabian Groffen |
30 |
Gentoo on a different level |