| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:27 PM Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 2/1/19 3:53 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Notes |
| 5 |
> > [N1] Infra is in a special role here, but so are a lot of other projects |
| 6 |
> > like comrel just to name another. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> One alternative is of course to start gradually, and only require WoT |
| 9 |
> for certain roles; offhand I can think of; Infra, Comrel, Security, |
| 10 |
> Trustees and Council. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Do we really want to tell developers they're not allowed to vote for a |
| 13 |
particular candidate for Council because that candidate didn't prove |
| 14 |
their identity? IMO developers should be as free as possible to elect |
| 15 |
whatever representatives they prefer. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Remember, Council members aren't just some kind of "privileged elite." |
| 18 |
They are also the way ordinary developers can exercise control over |
| 19 |
all the other people who would otherwise be the "privileged elite" in |
| 20 |
the absence of some kind of democratic representation. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I could see more of an argument for some of the other roles on the list. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives